Mr. Delmar is choosing to make a
decision about his choice of health care. In this way, he is choosing to
take charge of the situation to ensure that he has a say-so in the kind of care
he is to receive. Ms. Woods, the nurse practitioner, believes that
all patients should be able to act autonomously. She feels that by signing
the necessary documents and acting as his second opinion, that she is able
to fulfill his right to autonomy.
However, the bigger issue in this
scenario is the practice of beneficence that is an ethical principle which
all nurses should follow. Beneficence is the principle of doing good for the
client. Ms. Woods may believe that the best course of action for the
client is to act as a consult on the case so that he may choose to end his
life. However, in acting on this kind of thinking the nurse may instead hinder
the care of the patient. The physician acting as a secondary opinion will most
likely be able to have a better idea of the patients disease process for the
patient and would be able to make a better decision for care of the client.
They may be able to provide better forms of palliative care and other services
which the nurse cannot provide.
No comments:
Post a Comment